Know who is
really holding.
Ascertain separates real participants from coordinated and wash activity, then returns a Go, Wait or No-go verdict for where a token stands in the Ascend lifecycle. Every claim ships with evidence anyone can re-fetch from chain state.
Back-test on five simulated Elysium-testnet launches with planted ground truth. Reproduce with npm run backtest.
Five launches. Five verdicts.
Mock launches with planted ground truth: clean, early, concentrated, wash-traded and clustered. Some are simulated; the three marked on-chain are deployed on Elysium testnet. Open any of them and re-fetch the evidence.
Organic launch: wide holder base, varied entry sizes, one small family group, one genuine active trader.
Healthy but young: no manipulation signals, growth metrics have not reached the estimated bar yet.
Few holders, a handful of wallets own almost the whole float. Planted concentration.
Reasonable-looking holders, but most of the volume is twelve wallets trading with themselves.
Looks like 400+ holders. Most are wallets funded from four root sources, entering in synchronized batches.
On-chain mock launch: wide holder base, varied sizes, one small family group.
On-chain mock launch: most holders trace to three root funders via hub wallets.
On-chain mock launch: six wallets round-trip the pool and cycle tokens between themselves.
Newer protocol token
Mid-size HyperEVM token
From raw logs to a verdict you can audit.
Four stages, each deterministic and versioned. Nothing is published that has not survived a second, separate re-fetch.
- 01Index
Raw logs, block numbers and transaction hashes from Elysium (or any EVM chain) land in Postgres-style storage. Never only derived numbers.
- 02Detect
Concentration, funding-source clusters, same-block entry, wash loops and wallet age. Linked wallets merge into effective holders.
- 03Verify
A separate verifier re-fetches every cited fact from a second RPC source and compares byte for byte. Failures are withheld, in public.
- 04Decide
Versioned thresholds produce GO, WAIT or NO-GO. AI commentary can veto a Go. It can never unlock one.
Delete the verifier and nothing is published.
A finding goes live only if every fact it cites re-fetches from chain state and matches. If one does not, the claim is withheld and listed, with the reason. Try it on any token page: switch the verifier off and watch every finding drop.
# re-fetch it yourself
cast tx 0xe4d54889a150b58fa66ba59b2554511dd93256ba2c0b0a792ab187299d8dc8d2 --json --rpc-url https://testnet-rpc.elysium.kinetiq.xyzOne verdict, four ways to read it.
Where am I against Ascended, and what exactly do I fix? Get the failing rules, the gap, and a revenue and listing-reserve planner.
Is this volume organic before I buy? A fast verdict with the inflated share of volume called out.
What ecosystem tokens might I be exposed to, and how concentrated are they?
A callable source of truth over MCP, REST and x402, paid per answer, before an agent acts.
# 1. an agent asks, with no payment GET /v1/token/MIRA/readiness?tier=paid 402 Payment Required { x402Version: 1, accepts: [{ scheme: "exact", network: "base-sepolia", maxAmountRequired: "10000" }] } # 2. it signs a USDC authorization and retries GET /v1/token/MIRA/readiness?tier=paid X-PAYMENT: eyJ4NDAyVmVyc2lvbiI6MSwic2NoZW1l… 200 { verdict: "NO-GO", score: 44, findings: [8] }
Check before the agent acts. Pay a cent for the answer.
An MCP server, a REST API with an OpenAPI file, and x402 pay-per-answer ship in the first release. Verdicts are free to sample, deep reports are paid, evidence is always free.
Launch, Ascended, HyperCore spot, HIP-3.
Mapped to the criteria Ascend has published, with what is known and what is not disclosed at every stage.
- 01CurrentLaunchLive on testnet
- Closed hook pool, no bonding curve
- Quote assets: USDC and supported tokenized RWAs
- 1% token trading fee, split by creator tier
- Swap fee rate still under development
- 02AscendedCriteria published, thresholds internal
- Market cap, unique holders, volume
- Checks for concentrated or coordinated accumulation
- Exact thresholds and team discretion
- Unlocks buybacks and homepage placement
- 03HyperCore spotAfter Elysium mainnet
- Separate technical requirements and costs
- HyperCore precompiles ship about 4 weeks after mainnet
- No guarantee of listing
- 04HIP-3 perpsLater stage
- Separate technical requirements and costs
- No published timeline
What Ascertain does not claim.
- Scores are estimates. Ascend's real thresholds are internal and some rules are at team discretion. Ours are configurable, versioned and labelled as estimates.
- Elysium mainnet is pre-launch. Ascertain ships on testnet today; mainnet launch through Ascend is a roadmap milestone, not a promise.
- Patterns, not accusations. Clusters read as "linked by funding source". Ascertain never calls a person a scammer and publishes its false-positive rate and blind spots.
- Unaudited. No audit is claimed. The methodology, every threshold and the code are public.