Skip to content
Ascertain
Tokens
MIRA verdict
Creator dashboard

MIRA readiness

NO-GO

How close is this token to Ascended status, and what is holding it back? Everything below is an estimate from public Ascend criteria.

44partial est.
1 of 8 rules pass
  • Effective holders. Needs +112 (now 38, estimated bar 150).
  • Organic daily volume (time-weighted). Needs +$34,404 (now $5,596, estimated bar $40,000).
  • Effective / raw holders. Hard rule. Only 0.09 of raw holders are independent. Adding more linked wallets cannot fix this; only genuinely distinct holders can. Bar: 0.75.
  • Top-10 holder share. Reduce by 13.1 pts (now 58.1%, estimated limit 45.0%).
  • Top-1 holder share. Reduce by 12.6 pts (now 22.6%, estimated limit 10.0%).
  • Inflated volume share. Reduce by 2.9 pts (now 17.9%, estimated limit 15.0%).
  • Fresh-wallet share. Evidence for this rule is withheld, so it cannot be assessed yet.
Lifecycle

Where this token sits.

Launch is measurable today. Later stages are shown with what is documented and what Ascend has not disclosed.

  1. 01Current
    Launch
    Live on testnet
    • Closed hook pool, no bonding curve
    • Quote assets: USDC and supported tokenized RWAs
    • 1% token trading fee, split by creator tier
    • Swap fee rate still under development
  2. 02
    Ascended
    Criteria published, thresholds internal
    • Market cap, unique holders, volume
    • Checks for concentrated or coordinated accumulation
    • Exact thresholds and team discretion
    • Unlocks buybacks and homepage placement
  3. 03
    HyperCore spot
    After Elysium mainnet
    • Separate technical requirements and costs
    • HyperCore precompiles ship about 4 weeks after mainnet
    • No guarantee of listing
  4. 04
    HIP-3 perps
    Later stage
    • Separate technical requirements and costs
    • No published timeline
DocumentedAscertain estimateUnknownRoadmap stages are shown with disclosed unknowns, not promises.
Gap to Ascended

Every rule against the estimated bar.

RuleMeasuredEstimated barFitStatus
Market capitalization
growth · weight 15%
$314k>= $250k
Pass
Effective holders
growth · weight 20%
38>= 150
Below bar
Organic daily volume (time-weighted)
growth · weight 15%
$5.6k>= $40.0k
Below bar
Effective / raw holders
integrity · weight 15%
0.09>= 0.75
hard < 0.50
Hard fail
Top-10 holder share
integrity · weight 10%
58.1%<= 45.0%
hard > 80.0%
Below bar
Top-1 holder share
integrity · weight 5%
22.6%<= 10.0%
hard > 25.0%
Below bar
Inflated volume share
integrity · weight 15%
17.9%<= 15.0%
hard > 35.0%
Below bar
Fresh-wallet share
integrity · weight 5%
unverified<= 35.0%
hard > 70.0%
Unverified
Revenue and listing reserve

Model what this could earn, and what to set aside.

Uses the fee splits Ascend has published. Every figure is an assumption you control.

Average daily volume$6.0k
Creator tier
Fee share set aside for a HyperCore listing30%
Listing budget you want to reach (your assumption)$50.0k
Referred swap fees (optional)$0 / day

Assumptions from Ascend docs: 1% token trading fee, default deployer 25%, approved creator or takeover 50%, referrals 20% of referred users' swap fees. The swap-fee rate is still under development. HyperCore listing costs are not published, so the budget is yours to set. Ascend docs

Trading fees / day
$60
Creator share / day
$15
Reserve / day
$5
Take-home / day
$11
Reserve accumulation over 180 daysreaches $50.0k in ~11112d
budget $50.0k

A model, not a forecast. Volume is the lever Ascertain measures: only organic volume should be assumed, and wash volume would inflate fees you cannot count on.